2026 Guide | AI in Financial Services
EU Taxonomy, Regulatory ComplianceArticles

EU Taxonomy: Looking for Efficient, Accurate Reporting?

Published: October 3, 2022
Modified: October 3, 2022
Key Takeaways

Ensure your EU Taxonomy report is accurate and save time and money by leveraging technology

Whether you are looking for a more efficient way to report on EU Taxonomy, the broadest data coverage in the market, or the most reliable mapping of data to key taxonomy requirements (e.g., NACE code mapping) – you can find all of those with the help of advanced technology.

Download Brochure

First, EU Taxonomy reporting can be complex, but it doesn’t have to be. Often, those reporting are working through at least nine arduous steps to prepare their reports for regulators. What if instead of nine steps, you could do it in three? When the way to report is integrated directly into your workflow, you can experience more than a 50% gain in efficiency – including on the cost to report [See Figure 1].

Figure 1: Clarity AI is more efficient than any other provider


Additionally, solving for data coverage can be a bear. Without the right coverage, reporting certainly won’t be easy – in fact, it may be impossible.  We have not only the largest reported-data database – more than five times as much as the closest competitor – and a full database of more than 40,000 companies [See Figure 2]

Clarity AI' coverage for EU Taxonomy
Figure 2: Clarity AI offers the broadest coverage in the market, with a coverage of reported data 5x more than any other provider

 

Lastly, we see other providers mapping EU Taxonomy activities incorrectly due to their treatment of NACE codes. To learn more about the pitfalls of reporting without leveraging advanced technology, please download our 6-pager to see case studies of inaccurate data in other providers’ systems and how that could affect your EU Taxonomy reporting.

Download Case Studies

Research and Insights

Latest news and articles

Regulatory Compliance

Inside the ESG Ratings Regulation: what changes for investors from 2026

The EU ESG Ratings Regulation now requires providers to answer to ESMA on methodology, governance, and conflicts of interest. For investors who rely on ratings to inform decisions, that raises a practical question: what should you expect from your service providers now?Clarity AI’s Senior Legal Counsel Iulia Cospanaru will walk the audience through who the…

Regulatory Compliance

SFDR 2.0 in Trilogue: Where the Negotiations Stand and When the Rules Might Apply

Two questions have followed SFDR 2.0 since the Commission unveiled it in November 2025: what changes, and when. We covered the first in our initial breakdown of the overhaul, and the second in our guide to preparing for the new rules in January 2026. This piece focuses on the timeline itself: what is happening in…

AI

Data Center Energy Demand: The AI Ceiling Investors Need to Price In

AI is straining Western grids. Here's how energy demand, ratepayer costs, and supply chain limits reshape how investors assess AI-exposed companies.