Investing in the Age of AI
ClimateArticles

How Are OECD Companies Faring When it Comes to CO2 Emissions?

Published: February 7, 2023
Modified: February 7, 2023
Key Takeaways

In comparison to their Non-OECD counterparts, companies from OECD countries present a smaller intensity of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an international organisation that works to build better policies for better lives. Together with governments, policy makers and citizens, they work on establishing evidence-based international standards and finding solutions to a range of social, economic and environmental challenges.

Clarity AI wanted to compare CO2 emissions for OECD and Non-OECD countries, across all scopes. While OECD companies present a smaller intensity of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, Scope 3 is substantially higher, accounting for 88.42% of the emissions.

To dig into this result further, we explore the emissions at the industry level. On the one hand, we find that material-intensive industries (such as consumer staples) have much higher Scope 3 emissions in the OECD.

On the other hand, knowledge intensive industries (such as health care or communication services) have lower footprints in OECD countries, although Scope 3 still accounts for a significant portion. 

 

For all industries, Scope 3 emissions are higher in OECD countries than non-OECD countries. However, the breakdown by industry groups shows that in the Services sector, OECD countries emit overall less CO2 than non-OECD countries in spite of the Scope 3 emissions (see Industry Breakdown section).

Consistent with the literature, these results show how OECD economics offset lots of their carbon emissions to other countries.

 

Note: Intensity = TnCO2/MUSD

 

 

Research and Insights

Latest news and articles

ESG Impact

Are We Investing for the World We Have, or the One We Wish We Had?

Alex Rayón breaks down the hidden economic, social, and data risks of AI, explaining how unseen costs in today’s models could reshape investor decisions.

Climate, ESG Risk

The Water Cost of the Energy Transition: Where Corporate Disclosure Falls Short

Water risks are emerging as a major constraint on low-carbon technologies. Explore global disclosure gaps and what they mean for investors in our latest report.

Regulatory Compliance

Beyond the Rewrite: Implications of the SFDR 2.0 Proposal for Investors

As SFDR 2.0 takes shape, financial market participants face important decisions that go beyond interpreting updated definitions. This 45-minute session will focus on helping teams understand what truly matters for implementation, product strategy, and the sustainability data they need today and throughout the transition to the new SFDR. Join us on Wednesday, 3 December to…