The demand for ESG software and sustainability data platforms has surged in recent years, alongside an explosion in corporate disclosures. In 2013, fewer than 20% of the world’s largest companies reported on ESG performance. Today, it’s over 90%. But more data hasn’t made sustainable investing easier. It’s made it harder to tell what’s credible, what’s material, and what’s just noise.
At the same time, sustainability regulations are evolving. Some frameworks, like SFDR and CSRD in Europe, are being consolidated. Others, such as new disclosure requirements in the UK, Japan, Singapore, and other APAC markets, are just being introduced. While the direction is toward greater alignment, the burden of proof is growing. Investors must now demonstrate that their sustainability claims are backed by accurate, auditable, and defensible data.
While traditional ESG software has struggled to keep pace, AI-driven sustainability intelligence platforms have emerged to meet this challenge. They offer scalable analysis, automated research, and real-time insights that go far beyond what human teams can do alone. But not all platforms are created equal.
This guide lays out the key criteria to consider when selecting a sustainability provider, whether you’re evaluating an ESG software solution or an AI-driven sustainability intelligence platform like Clarity AI.
The goal is to help you separate the black boxes from the tools that actually move the needle.
What to Look for in ESG Software and Sustainability Intelligence Platforms
1. Data Quality and Coverage
The value of any insight starts with the integrity of the data behind it. AI can analyze thousands of data points in seconds, but if the underlying information is incomplete, outdated, or biased, the results will be misleading.
For institutional investors managing diverse, multi-asset portfolios, high-quality sustainability data is table stakes. Many ESG software solutions offer basic coverage, but few can deliver the depth, accuracy, and automation required at scale.
Weak data can result in flawed risk assessments, missed opportunities, or non-compliant disclosures. In 2023, for example, Calstrs, one of the world’s largest pension plans, had to delay the publication of its 2023 climate report after discovering significant data issues when calculating the carbon footprint of its $331 billion portfolio.
A platform with strong data coverage and granularity enables deeper risk and opportunity analysis. For example, a system that detects discrepancies between reported emissions and internal validation checks, and triggers estimates when needed, can help investors identify potential greenwashing before it escalates.
In contrast, a tool without robust controversy monitoring might miss early signals, such as a subsidiary’s involvement in forced labor flagged by NGO reports. This can leave investors exposed to reputational or financial risk.
When evaluating a platform, look closely at:
- Coverage: The platform should support your current investment universe and be able to scale with your future needs.
- Depth: It should go beyond high-level ESG scores, offering detailed, raw indicators across a wide range of sustainability factors.
- Sources: Strong platforms triangulate from company disclosures, regulatory filings, satellite imagery, NGO databases, media coverage, and other alternative sources.
- Completeness and estimation: Missing data should be addressed using transparent methodologies, with machine learning estimates clearly flagged and traceable.
- Quality checks at scale: Look for platforms that leverage AI to run automated validation checks across large datasets to ensure accuracy, consistency, and reliability without manual effort.
⚠️ Red flag warning: Be cautious of platforms that rely primarily on company self-reporting without applying automated validation. If the platform lacks data normalization, reliability scoring, or a clear way to flag and correct errors, it may be rewarding disclosure volume over actual performance, creating blind spots, misclassifications, or inflated scores that undermine both credibility and risk analysis.
Questions to Ask:
- What data sources do you use, and how frequently are they updated?
- Can the provider support my current investment universe and scale with future needs?
- How do you ensure data quality across different asset classes and geographies?
- How is missing or estimated data handled, and are estimation methodologies transparent?
2. Data Verifiability
In sustainable investing, trust in the data is non-negotiable. Investors not only need to understand where a data point came from, they need to prove it to clients, auditors, and regulators. If you can’t trace a data point back to its origin, you can’t confidently act on it, let alone defend it in a disclosure or due diligence process.
The ability to verify sustainability data should be a baseline expectation, but many platforms still fall short. Outputs often come with little more than a score and a vague methodology summary, leaving analysts to guess which sources were used and how metrics were calculated. This lack of clarity leads to unnecessary manual validation, duplicated effort, and ultimately, less confidence in the insights.
A verifiable platform or ESG software solution or sustainability intelligence platform should allow users to:
- Trace any metric or data point back to its original source document.
- See the exact section or sentence where the data was extracted.
- Distinguish between reported and estimated data, with clear flags.
⚠️ Red flag warning: If a platform doesn’t let you trace data points back to their original source, or relies on proprietary processes that obscure where the data came from and how it was validated, you’re forced to trust outputs you can’t verify. Heavy reliance on self-reported disclosures or unvetted public sources, combined with closed methodologies, increases the risk of inflated scores, missed red flags, and compliance blind spots.
Questions to Ask:
- Can I trace metrics back to original documentation or filings?
- Is there a clear audit trail for how each metric was calculated or inferred?
3. Data Access and Delivery
No matter how powerful a sustainability platform or ESG software solution is, it’s only as useful as it is usable. For institutional investors managing complex workflows, data needs to be accessible in the right format, through the right channels, and at the right time. A tool that only works within its own interface—or restricts data to static exports—can quickly become a bottleneck.
Think about the range of stakeholders who rely on sustainability data: portfolio managers need ESG scores in their investment systems; analysts want to pull raw metrics into Excel or Python models; reporting teams need clean outputs for disclosures. If the platform can’t meet all those needs, teams are forced to work around it, introducing friction, inefficiency, and risk.
A well-designed solution should provide:
- Multiple access points: A web-based interface for day-to-day users, but also availability through third-party tools, cloud environments, or data terminals your team already uses.
- Flexible delivery formats: Raw data feeds, Excel exports, and APIs that let you extract and manipulate the data however your workflow demands.
- Integration options: The ability to plug sustainability data into internal tools, dashboards, or portfolio management systems, minimizing the need to switch platforms or reformat files.
- Speed and reliability: Stable performance at scale, including support for large batch exports or automated updates via scheduled data pulls.
⚠️ Red flag warning: If the platform limits data access through restrictive licensing, lacks developer-friendly APIs, or only supports rigid formats and delayed updates, it can create serious friction across your organization. Poor documentation, inconsistent delivery schedules, and ESG software integration barriers will slow down analysis, increase operational risk, and limit your ability to embed insights where and when they’re needed most.
Questions to Ask:
- What integration options do you support for internal systems?
- Do you offer plug-and-play components or software development kits (SDKs)?
- How stable are your data delivery mechanisms?
4. Transparency and Explainability
If you can’t explain how a provider arrived at a score or metric, you probably can’t trust it. And neither will your clients, auditors, or regulators. This is especially true for ESG software, where methodologies are often unclear or inconsistently applied across data sets.
In an environment where sustainability data is used to inform investment decisions, construct portfolios, and meet regulatory obligations, transparency into the underlying methodologies is critical.
Say a company receives a low ESG Score (meaning, higher risk). Without knowing whether that reflects unresolved controversies, material exposures, or gaps in governance practices, you have no way to assess whether the signal is actionable or overstated. Worse, if the scoring methodology is opaque, you may not know which issues were considered, how severity was weighted, or whether incidents were verified or outdated—making it difficult to trust or defend the result.
A transparent, explainable platform should give you:
- Clear methodologies: Detailed documentation of how each score or metric is constructed, including the data inputs, frameworks used, and weighting schemes applied.
- AI model visibility: Information on how estimation and projection models are built, trained, and validated, along with confidence levels that help users interpret outputs appropriately.
- Accessible logic: Easy-to-understand explanations that don’t require a data science degree to follow—so investment teams, compliance officers, and client advisors can all stay aligned.
- Consistency and documentation: Updates to methodologies should be logged and made available, so your team can track changes over time and ensure consistent application across portfolios.
⚠️ Red flag warning: If a platform uses scoring frameworks that aren’t clearly explained, or fails to disclose how issues are weighted, how scores change over time or where controversy information comes from, you may be relying on a black-box system. Lack of access to source documents, vague methodology updates, and unclear rating scales make it difficult to understand, compare, or justify ESG scores, especially across sectors or timeframes.
Questions to Ask:
- Can you walk me through your scoring or modelling methodology?
- How do you validate your models for accuracy and bias?
5. System Integration
For sustainability data to create real value, it needs to move seamlessly between platforms, teams, and business units. Whether you’re using sustainability metrics for risk management, regulatory compliance, or portfolio analysis, the data must integrate cleanly into the systems your teams already use.
Too often, that’s not the case. Sustainability data gets stuck inside proprietary dashboards, gated APIs, or rigid CSV templates that weren’t built to support modern, multi-system environments. When integration is difficult or fragile, investment workflows become slow, fragmented, and overly reliant on manual handoffs between teams.
A flexible, well-integrated solution should support:
- Plug-and-play APIs and widgets: Prebuilt components and embeddable tools that connect to your existing systems—without weeks of custom dev work.
- Compatibility across functions: Interoperability with tools for governance, risk, compliance, supply chain, sustainability reporting, and investment management.
- Stable infrastructure and documentation: Modern APIs with clear schema definitions, and well-documented endpoints, enabling fast, reliable integration into any system.
- Low-friction onboarding: Fast authentication, sandbox environments, and developer support that helps teams test, scale, and adapt quickly.
⚠️ Red flag warning: If the platform lacks prebuilt connectors, provides little technical documentation, or requires heavy custom development just to plug into your core systems, you’ll end up with brittle integrations and siloed sustainability data. These barriers often slow down adoption, increase costs, and lock your teams into workflows that can’t evolve.
Questions to Ask:
- What systems does your platform integrate with out of the box?
- Are APIs available and well-documented for technical teams?
- How long does a typical integration or onboarding take?
6. Customized Dashboards & Data Visualizations
For sustainability insights to drive action, they need to be understandable at a glance and adaptable to your team’s needs. Dashboards that are cluttered, rigid, or opaque don’t just frustrate users. They slow down analysis, erode trust in the data, and make it harder to align decisions across portfolio, risk, compliance, and reporting teams.
Many platforms treat dashboards as static reporting layers, offering prebuilt visualizations with limited interactivity or transparency. That means users are stuck toggling between tabs, exporting raw data, and building their own charts in external tools, all of which take time and introduce errors.
A modern sustainability solution should offer:
- Modular, customizable dashboards: The ability to tailor layouts, filters, and views by region, theme, portfolio without needing a developer.
- Interactive visualizations: Clickable graphs that allow users to drill down into individual data points, toggle dimensions, and explore context behind trends.
- Consistent formatting and metadata exposure: Clear labeling of timeframes, units, sources, and methodology changes so that what you see can actually be trusted.
- Seamless exports and embeddable assets: Visuals should be easy to integrate into internal systems, client reports, or executive presentations, with flexible output formats that preserve styling and interactivity.
⚠️ Red flag warning: If dashboards are static, cluttered, or inconsistent, and don’t allow you to customize views, drill into the data, or understand what you’re seeing, you’ll end up exporting everything just to rebuild insights manually. Over time, this disconnect between platform output and real-world usability can stall adoption and limit the impact of your sustainability strategy.
Questions to Ask:
- How customizable are your dashboards, filters, and scoring frameworks?
- Can users drill down from visualizations into raw data and methodology?
- How easy is it to export visuals or data into internal reports and presentations?
7. User Experience and Support
Even the most advanced sustainability platform needs to be backed by responsive, knowledgeable support. Whether you’re rolling out a new data integration, adjusting your reporting framework, or troubleshooting an issue with a data point, the speed and quality of service you receive can have a direct impact on performance, compliance, and client trust.
Yet support is often where platforms fall short. Many providers offer rigid, formal complaint processes that prioritize internal compliance over customer experience. Clients are left filling out forms, waiting on email replies, and wondering when—or if—their issue will be resolved. For fast-moving investment teams and technical users, this lack of real-time support creates unnecessary delays and friction.
A service-oriented provider should offer:
- Dedicated support teams for sustainability-specific queries, including data, methodology, and platform issues.
- Onboarding and implementation help that includes roadmap planning, data customization, and training.
- Clear communication and transparency around issue status, expected resolution timelines, and escalation paths.
- Flexible feedback loops, not just formal submissions, so users can flag improvements, report bugs, or ask questions without going through a bureaucratic process.
⚠️ Red flag warning: If the platform only supports formal complaint submissions, doesn’t provide a clear escalation process, or lacks visibility into issue tracking and timelines, your team may be left waiting on critical answers. Over time, this erodes trust and forces internal workarounds that slow down adoption and limit value.
Questions to Ask:
- Do you provide dedicated sustainability support teams for implementation and ongoing use?
- How quickly do you typically resolve support issues?
- What kind of onboarding and training do you offer new users?
From ESG Software to Sustainability Intelligence Platforms: Choose Carefully, Scale Confidently
The future of sustainable investing will be shaped by the quality of the data investors rely on, the transparency of the systems they use, and the speed at which they can act.
The limitations of legacy ESG software—rigid interfaces, slow updates, and black-box scoring—have created demand for more intelligent, integrated solutions. Sustainability technology platforms that leverage AI are not just tools for automation. They are decision engines. And the wrong one can slow you down, expose you to risk, or steer you in the wrong direction entirely.
This guide is designed to help you look beneath the surface. It is easy for any provider to claim broad coverage or cutting-edge capabilities. What matters is whether the platform delivers information you can trust, interpret, and apply across teams, systems, and decisions.
As regulations evolve, reporting expectations grow, and clients demand greater accountability, ESG software and sustainability platforms need to offer more than scores or summaries. They need to work across your firm, produce defensible insights, and reduce friction between insight and action.
The most effective solution is often the one that disappears into the background. It supports your teams across functions, strengthens compliance and communication, and helps you move quickly and confidently toward your sustainability and performance goals. By asking the right questions and focusing on what matters most, you can avoid black-box ESG software systems and choose a partner that supports your strategy today and prepares you for what comes next.
Want to See Clarity AI in Action?
We’d be happy to walk you through how our platform aligns with these criteria and where we can add value across your investment process.
Contact our team to schedule a personalized walkthrough or Q&A.
Author Information
