2026 Guide | AI in Financial Services
Regulatory ComplianceArticles

SFDR: Breaking Down the Level Two Regulatory Technical Standards

Published: January 31, 2023
Modified: January 31, 2023
Key Takeaways

Tech-Enabled Reporting is Easy Using the Templates in Annexes 1-5 of the SFDR’s Level Two Regulatory Technical Standards

From January 1, 2023, the “level two regulatory technical standards” (RTS) for SFDR began to apply. This means that in scope asset managers need to begin reporting using the templates included in Annex 1 – 5 of the RTS here

  • Annex 1: Principal Adverse Indicator metrics that in scope entities (those with >500 employees and those who did not actively opt out) must disclose for full year 2022 before June 2023. This template can also be used for product level reporting where applicable. 

The remaining Annexes contain the supplementary information required for Article 8 and Article 9 funds:

  • Annex 2: Article 8 pre-contractual disclosures (i.e. including how will this fund consider environmental or social characteristics, what is the level of sustainable investment or taxonomy alignment, if any);
  • Annex 3: Article 9 pre-contractual disclosures (i.e. including what is the environmental or social objective of the fund, what is the level of sustainable investment, and what is the taxonomy alignment, if any);
  • Annex 4: Article 8 ongoing annual disclosure (i.e. including how did the fund meet its environmental or social characteristics, what was the actual level of sustainable investment or taxonomy alignment, if any); and
  • Annex 5: Article 9 ongoing annual disclosure (i.e. including how did the fund meet its environmental or social objective, what was the actual level of sustainable investment and what, if any, was the taxonomy alignment).

The information in these templates can also be recorded in the European ESG Template (EET) which is an industry led (voluntary) initiative where asset managers can pre populate the relevant information from Annexes 2-5 in a format that can be passed to their distributors and eventually to the end investor. 

Clarity AI is well placed to support financial market participants (FMPs) as these new requirements come in:

  1. Through Clarity AI’s SFDR module, firms can prepare their product or entity level PAI report. This module also contains a functionality to pre-populate the EET.
  2. Through Clarity AI’s EU Taxonomy module, users can generate and prepopulate the four annexes (numbers 2-5) for pre-contractual and ongoing disclosure for Article 8 and 9 funds.
  3. Through its Article 2(17) product, Clarity AI can support FMPs to determine if their investments are sustainable or not under the SFDR definition of Sustainable Investment.

The Level 2 requirements can be difficult to navigate. In fact, in anticipation of their application, we observed some funds “downgrading” from Article 9 to Article 8 status to avoid falling foul of the standards outlined under Article 9. Article 8 standards are also subject to an ongoing consultation by ESMA in an effort to introduce more robust minimum standards for Article 8 funds. This would include, amongst other things,  a minimum threshold of 50% of sustainable investment as defined by SFDR Article 2(17) (not 40% as we have seen reported elsewhere). It is therefore as important as ever that financial market participants be able to leverage technology to ensure they can respond fully to the complex regulatory standards outlined in the RTS.

Research and Insights

Latest news and articles

Market Insights

How Investors Are Navigating Geopolitical Risk

Geopolitical risk has always been priced into investment decisions, but rarely has it demanded a rethink of the assumptions beneath them. Today it does. The question facing long-term investors is no longer whether geopolitical events move markets. It is whether the frameworks built over decades to guide portfolio construction, exclusion policy, and asset allocation still…

ESG Risk, Gender Equality

The diversity say-do gap: Two-thirds of companies with discrimination violations also claim diversity initiatives

June is a month when corporate communications are filled with Pride messaging, diversity commitments, and inclusion statements. But beyond the visibility of these declarations, a more complex question remains: do these commitments consistently align with companies’ actual conduct? At Clarity AI, we looked at whether companies with active discrimination controversies in practice also publicly emphasize…

Climate

The physical risk gap: What today’s datasets are missing

Access to physical risk data is no longer the problem. Most asset managers who need it have it. Far fewer have data that holds up when it matters: under regulatory scrutiny, in client reporting, or when trying to act on it. Taking place in the heart of the climate week season, after Zurich and London,…