2026 Guide | AI in Financial Services
Climate, Regulatory ComplianceArticles, Podcasts

Regulatory Update: SEC and California Climate Rules

Published: March 14, 2024
Modified: August 14, 2025
Key Takeaways

Transcript:

On the 6th of March 2024 the US Securities and Exchange Commission -or SECFINALLY published its long awaited rule on climate-related disclosures. The rules will, for the first time, mandate that SEC registrants, mostly listed companies, report on the impact of climate-related risks to their business, as well as the Scope 1 and 2 emissions

While this is clearly a major milestone, many commentators were disappointed with the ambition of the final rule versus the proposed rule from 2022. For example, the requirement to report on Scope 3 emissions, which we know represent around 80% of emissions globally, has been removed entirely. For Scopes 1 and 2 there is also no requirement for around 50% of registrants to report this at all and those that do report can do so subject to their own “materiality” assessment. Finally, the requirement to quantify climate risks in the financial statements now only applies to those risks related to severe weather events.

While there are reasons to be pessimistic, it is also the case that US companies may be captured by other more ambitious rules, such as the EU’s CSRD or US state legislation. One example of the latter is the California Climate Accountability Package, passed in late 2023. This rule will require Californian companies to report on climate-related risks, as well as the Scope 1,2 and 3 emissions, and covers many of the same companies captured by the SEC rule. 

While we are seeing progress, both the California and the SEC rules are already facing legal challenges. We eagerly await the outcome of those challenges and look forward to more progress on climate reporting globally.  


See here the legal challenges of the rule and the delay in its implementation.

Research and Insights

Latest news and articles

Climate

The Target-CapEx Disconnect: Why Climate Pledges Don’t Equal Transition Financing

Ambitious climate targets barely lift green CapEx: 27% vs 25% for companies with no target. Economics, not pledges, drive transition spending.

Regulatory Compliance

Inside the ESG Ratings Regulation: what changes for investors from 2026

The EU ESG Ratings Regulation now requires providers to answer to ESMA on methodology, governance, and conflicts of interest. For investors who rely on ratings to inform decisions, that raises a practical question: what should you expect from your service providers now?Clarity AI’s Compliance Lead Iulia Cospanaru will walk the audience through who the regulation…

Regulatory Compliance

SFDR 2.0 in Trilogue: Where the Negotiations Stand and When the Rules Might Apply

Two questions have followed SFDR 2.0 since the Commission unveiled it in November 2025: what changes, and when. We covered the first in our initial breakdown of the overhaul, and the second in our guide to preparing for the new rules in January 2026. This piece focuses on the timeline itself: what is happening in…