2026 Guide | AI in Financial Services
ClimateArticles

How Are OECD Companies Faring When it Comes to CO2 Emissions?

Published: February 7, 2023
Modified: February 7, 2023
Key Takeaways

In comparison to their Non-OECD counterparts, companies from OECD countries present a smaller intensity of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an international organisation that works to build better policies for better lives. Together with governments, policy makers and citizens, they work on establishing evidence-based international standards and finding solutions to a range of social, economic and environmental challenges.

Clarity AI wanted to compare CO2 emissions for OECD and Non-OECD countries, across all scopes. While OECD companies present a smaller intensity of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, Scope 3 is substantially higher, accounting for 88.42% of the emissions.

To dig into this result further, we explore the emissions at the industry level. On the one hand, we find that material-intensive industries (such as consumer staples) have much higher Scope 3 emissions in the OECD.

On the other hand, knowledge intensive industries (such as health care or communication services) have lower footprints in OECD countries, although Scope 3 still accounts for a significant portion. 

 

For all industries, Scope 3 emissions are higher in OECD countries than non-OECD countries. However, the breakdown by industry groups shows that in the Services sector, OECD countries emit overall less CO2 than non-OECD countries in spite of the Scope 3 emissions (see Industry Breakdown section).

Consistent with the literature, these results show how OECD economics offset lots of their carbon emissions to other countries.

 

Note: Intensity = TnCO2/MUSD

 

 

Research and Insights

Latest news and articles

Regulatory Compliance

Inside the ESG Ratings Regulation: what changes for investors from 2026

The EU ESG Ratings Regulation now requires providers to answer to ESMA on methodology, governance, and conflicts of interest. For investors who rely on ratings to inform decisions, that raises a practical question: what should you expect from your service providers now?Clarity AI’s Senior Legal Counsel Iulia Cospanaru will walk the audience through who the…

Regulatory Compliance

SFDR 2.0 in Trilogue: Where the Negotiations Stand and When the Rules Might Apply

Two questions have followed SFDR 2.0 since the Commission unveiled it in November 2025: what changes, and when. We covered the first in our initial breakdown of the overhaul, and the second in our guide to preparing for the new rules in January 2026. This piece focuses on the timeline itself: what is happening in…

AI

Data Center Energy Demand: The AI Ceiling Investors Need to Price In

AI is straining Western grids. Here's how energy demand, ratepayer costs, and supply chain limits reshape how investors assess AI-exposed companies.