2026 Guide | AI in Financial Services
ClimateArticles

How Are OECD Companies Faring When it Comes to CO2 Emissions?

Published: February 7, 2023
Modified: February 7, 2023
Key Takeaways

In comparison to their Non-OECD counterparts, companies from OECD countries present a smaller intensity of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an international organisation that works to build better policies for better lives. Together with governments, policy makers and citizens, they work on establishing evidence-based international standards and finding solutions to a range of social, economic and environmental challenges.

Clarity AI wanted to compare CO2 emissions for OECD and Non-OECD countries, across all scopes. While OECD companies present a smaller intensity of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, Scope 3 is substantially higher, accounting for 88.42% of the emissions.

To dig into this result further, we explore the emissions at the industry level. On the one hand, we find that material-intensive industries (such as consumer staples) have much higher Scope 3 emissions in the OECD.

On the other hand, knowledge intensive industries (such as health care or communication services) have lower footprints in OECD countries, although Scope 3 still accounts for a significant portion. 

 

For all industries, Scope 3 emissions are higher in OECD countries than non-OECD countries. However, the breakdown by industry groups shows that in the Services sector, OECD countries emit overall less CO2 than non-OECD countries in spite of the Scope 3 emissions (see Industry Breakdown section).

Consistent with the literature, these results show how OECD economics offset lots of their carbon emissions to other countries.

 

Note: Intensity = TnCO2/MUSD

 

 

Research and Insights

Latest news and articles

Market Insights

How Investors Are Navigating Geopolitical Risk

Geopolitical risk has always been priced into investment decisions, but rarely has it demanded a rethink of the assumptions beneath them. Today it does. The question facing long-term investors is no longer whether geopolitical events move markets. It is whether the frameworks built over decades to guide portfolio construction, exclusion policy, and asset allocation still…

ESG Risk, Gender Equality

The diversity say-do gap: Two-thirds of companies with discrimination violations also claim diversity initiatives

June is a month when corporate communications are filled with Pride messaging, diversity commitments, and inclusion statements. But beyond the visibility of these declarations, a more complex question remains: do these commitments consistently align with companies’ actual conduct? At Clarity AI, we looked at whether companies with active discrimination controversies in practice also publicly emphasize…

Climate

The physical risk gap: What today’s datasets are missing

Access to physical risk data is no longer the problem. Most asset managers who need it have it. Far fewer have data that holds up when it matters: under regulatory scrutiny, in client reporting, or when trying to act on it. Taking place in the heart of the climate week season, after Zurich and London,…