Investing in the Age of AI
ClimateArticles

How Are OECD Companies Faring When it Comes to CO2 Emissions?

Published: February 7, 2023
Modified: February 7, 2023
Key Takeaways

In comparison to their Non-OECD counterparts, companies from OECD countries present a smaller intensity of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an international organisation that works to build better policies for better lives. Together with governments, policy makers and citizens, they work on establishing evidence-based international standards and finding solutions to a range of social, economic and environmental challenges.

Clarity AI wanted to compare CO2 emissions for OECD and Non-OECD countries, across all scopes. While OECD companies present a smaller intensity of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, Scope 3 is substantially higher, accounting for 88.42% of the emissions.

To dig into this result further, we explore the emissions at the industry level. On the one hand, we find that material-intensive industries (such as consumer staples) have much higher Scope 3 emissions in the OECD.

On the other hand, knowledge intensive industries (such as health care or communication services) have lower footprints in OECD countries, although Scope 3 still accounts for a significant portion. 

 

For all industries, Scope 3 emissions are higher in OECD countries than non-OECD countries. However, the breakdown by industry groups shows that in the Services sector, OECD countries emit overall less CO2 than non-OECD countries in spite of the Scope 3 emissions (see Industry Breakdown section).

Consistent with the literature, these results show how OECD economics offset lots of their carbon emissions to other countries.

 

Note: Intensity = TnCO2/MUSD

 

 

Research and Insights

Latest news and articles

Climate

Top-down, bottom-up, disclosure: building a physical climate risk view that holds up

Climate risk management is becoming a fiduciary duty. In 2020, the Australian pension fund REST settled a landmark case with member Mark McVeigh, committing to new disclosure processes and acknowledging that climate change is a material financial risk to its investments. But disclosure alone is no longer enough. Clients are paying attention to what the…

Climate

Data-Center Power Has Quadrupled. Big Tech’s Reported Scope 2 Has Done the Opposite

Data center power demand has quadrupled due to the artificial intelligence boom, but Big Tech’s reported carbon footprints are doing the opposite. Global carbon accounting rules are at the core of this inconsistency: under current greenhouse gas global (GHG) reporting standards, companies can report their electricity-related emissions (i.e., scope 2) using different accounting rules: Companies…

Market Insights

Geopolitical Risk and Portfolio Decisions: How Investors Are Adapting Policies, Exclusions, and Oversight

Geopolitical risk is currently reshaping how investors think about exclusions, investment policy, and portfolio oversight. At the same time, it is rewriting the macroeconomic playbook that long-term capital owners have relied on for decades. Trade fragmentation, shifting alliances, and a more interventionist policy environment are forcing investors to reconcile top-down macro views with bottom-up portfolio…