Investing in the Age of AI
Regulatory ComplianceArticles

How to Satisfy EU Taxonomy Regulation Requirements with Limited Data

Published: November 18, 2021
Modified: November 18, 2021
Key Takeaways

Clarity AI’s EU Taxonomy solution helps investors address sustainability data coverage gaps

There is an obvious disconnect occurring in the market, between what investors need to report as it relates to the EU Taxonomy and what type of data is available to inform that reporting. The lingering question for investors is, how do we broaden the coverage of the data we have while maintaining quality and satisfying the regulatory requirements. 

Clarity AI uses models to take the information that is available and create our best effort analysis to inform the reporting requirement. To bring this modeling to life we have created an example of how we evaluate EU taxonomy activity (See illustration below). We will be using an example of the technical criteria to determine if your investment is making a substantial contribution.

The example is regarding climate change mitigation, specifically, the transmission and distribution of electricity. There are 3 different criteria to evaluate whether the activity is sustainable or not. The first criteria in the regulation is whether the system is an interconnected European system, determining what areas they are selling and what systems they are operating in. If the answer is no, they are selling beyond the interconnected European system then we move to the second criteria in the regulatory text, emission factors. We analyze the average emission for the country in which the company is operating, then we review whether that is below 100gCO2 per KWh. If the average emission factor is not below this figure then we would move to the third criteria, generation capacity. We look at a five year rolling period, per the regulation, and we assess what capacity has been installed during this period, does it meet the technical criteria of below 100gCO2 per KWh. If it does meet the criteria then you comply, if not then it does not contribute to the Taxonomy.

This is a strong real life example of how you can use the limited data available in a systematic and methodical way to achieve results. We pulled together different pieces of information to make an assessment, activity by activity, leveraging the data that is available. Utilizing advanced technology like artificial intelligence, machine learning and Natural Language Processing makes this possible with many different specific regulations when evaluating whether a company meets or does not meet the regulation requirements.

Research and Insights

Latest news and articles

Climate

Data-Center Power Has Quadrupled. Big Tech’s Reported Scope 2 Has Done the Opposite

Data center power demand has quadrupled due to the artificial intelligence boom, but Big Tech’s reported carbon footprints are doing the opposite. Global carbon accounting rules are at the core of this inconsistency: under current greenhouse gas global (GHG) reporting standards, companies can report their electricity-related emissions (i.e., scope 2) using different accounting rules: Companies…

Geopolitical Risk and Portfolio Decisions: How Investors Are Adapting Policies, Exclusions, and Oversight

Geopolitical risk is currently reshaping how investors think about exclusions, investment policy, and portfolio oversight. At the same time, it is rewriting the macroeconomic playbook that long-term capital owners have relied on for decades. Trade fragmentation, shifting alliances, and a more interventionist policy environment are forcing investors to reconcile top-down macro views with bottom-up portfolio…

AI

AI Strategy for Financial Services: What’s Actually Working in 2026

AI is reshaping financial services faster than most firms can absorb it. What separates the winners from those still untangling decisions made two years ago?