Investing in the Age of AI
Regulatory ComplianceArticles

How to Satisfy EU Taxonomy Regulation Requirements with Limited Data

Published: November 18, 2021
Modified: November 18, 2021
Key Takeaways

Clarity AI’s EU Taxonomy solution helps investors address sustainability data coverage gaps

There is an obvious disconnect occurring in the market, between what investors need to report as it relates to the EU Taxonomy and what type of data is available to inform that reporting. The lingering question for investors is, how do we broaden the coverage of the data we have while maintaining quality and satisfying the regulatory requirements. 

Clarity AI uses models to take the information that is available and create our best effort analysis to inform the reporting requirement. To bring this modeling to life we have created an example of how we evaluate EU taxonomy activity (See illustration below). We will be using an example of the technical criteria to determine if your investment is making a substantial contribution.

The example is regarding climate change mitigation, specifically, the transmission and distribution of electricity. There are 3 different criteria to evaluate whether the activity is sustainable or not. The first criteria in the regulation is whether the system is an interconnected European system, determining what areas they are selling and what systems they are operating in. If the answer is no, they are selling beyond the interconnected European system then we move to the second criteria in the regulatory text, emission factors. We analyze the average emission for the country in which the company is operating, then we review whether that is below 100gCO2 per KWh. If the average emission factor is not below this figure then we would move to the third criteria, generation capacity. We look at a five year rolling period, per the regulation, and we assess what capacity has been installed during this period, does it meet the technical criteria of below 100gCO2 per KWh. If it does meet the criteria then you comply, if not then it does not contribute to the Taxonomy.

This is a strong real life example of how you can use the limited data available in a systematic and methodical way to achieve results. We pulled together different pieces of information to make an assessment, activity by activity, leveraging the data that is available. Utilizing advanced technology like artificial intelligence, machine learning and Natural Language Processing makes this possible with many different specific regulations when evaluating whether a company meets or does not meet the regulation requirements.

Research and Insights

Latest news and articles

Regulatory Compliance

Sustainable Finance Regulation in 2026: Fragmentation, Data Gaps, and the New Reality for Investors

Are we entering a new era of pragmatic complexity, or simply losing the thread of the sustainability agenda? With this question, Lorenzo Saa, Chief Sustainability Officer at Clarity AI, opened a recent conversation with Patricia Pina, Clarity AI’s Chief Research Officer, and Cornelius Müller, Policy Officer at the Sustainable Banking Coalition. The group discussed over…

Climate

The Climate Risk Toolkit: Scenarios, Models, and Getting it Right

Climate risk disclosure has shifted from a differentiator to the baseline, and the expectations keep moving. Institutional investors must now disclose and manage climate-related risks across multiple warming scenarios. The challenge is how: Join us to explore how financial institutions are operationalising climate risk through scenario analysis, forward-looking metrics, and AI-driven workflows. Through real case…

AI

What AI Adoption Really Looks Like in Finance: A Conversation at the NYSE

Clarity AI's Lillian Freiberg joins FintechTV at the NYSE to discuss AI adoption, mandate execution, and smarter investment workflows.