2026 Guide | AI in Financial Services
Regulatory ComplianceArticles

How to Satisfy EU Taxonomy Regulation Requirements with Limited Data

Published: November 18, 2021
Modified: November 18, 2021
Key Takeaways

Clarity AI’s EU Taxonomy solution helps investors address sustainability data coverage gaps

There is an obvious disconnect occurring in the market, between what investors need to report as it relates to the EU Taxonomy and what type of data is available to inform that reporting. The lingering question for investors is, how do we broaden the coverage of the data we have while maintaining quality and satisfying the regulatory requirements. 

Clarity AI uses models to take the information that is available and create our best effort analysis to inform the reporting requirement. To bring this modeling to life we have created an example of how we evaluate EU taxonomy activity (See illustration below). We will be using an example of the technical criteria to determine if your investment is making a substantial contribution.

The example is regarding climate change mitigation, specifically, the transmission and distribution of electricity. There are 3 different criteria to evaluate whether the activity is sustainable or not. The first criteria in the regulation is whether the system is an interconnected European system, determining what areas they are selling and what systems they are operating in. If the answer is no, they are selling beyond the interconnected European system then we move to the second criteria in the regulatory text, emission factors. We analyze the average emission for the country in which the company is operating, then we review whether that is below 100gCO2 per KWh. If the average emission factor is not below this figure then we would move to the third criteria, generation capacity. We look at a five year rolling period, per the regulation, and we assess what capacity has been installed during this period, does it meet the technical criteria of below 100gCO2 per KWh. If it does meet the criteria then you comply, if not then it does not contribute to the Taxonomy.

This is a strong real life example of how you can use the limited data available in a systematic and methodical way to achieve results. We pulled together different pieces of information to make an assessment, activity by activity, leveraging the data that is available. Utilizing advanced technology like artificial intelligence, machine learning and Natural Language Processing makes this possible with many different specific regulations when evaluating whether a company meets or does not meet the regulation requirements.

Research and Insights

Latest news and articles

Climate

The Target-CapEx Disconnect: Why Climate Pledges Don’t Equal Transition Financing

Ambitious climate targets barely lift green CapEx: 27% vs 25% for companies with no target. Economics, not pledges, drive transition spending.

Regulatory Compliance

Inside the ESG Ratings Regulation: what changes for investors from 2026

The EU ESG Ratings Regulation now requires providers to answer to ESMA on methodology, governance, and conflicts of interest. For investors who rely on ratings to inform decisions, that raises a practical question: what should you expect from your service providers now?Clarity AI’s Compliance Lead Iulia Cospanaru will walk the audience through who the regulation…

Regulatory Compliance

SFDR 2.0 in Trilogue: Where the Negotiations Stand and When the Rules Might Apply

Two questions have followed SFDR 2.0 since the Commission unveiled it in November 2025: what changes, and when. We covered the first in our initial breakdown of the overhaul, and the second in our guide to preparing for the new rules in January 2026. This piece focuses on the timeline itself: what is happening in…